Why Rejecting an Investment (Or Asking for More) Might Be the Right Decision

Listen to this article
0:00 4:00
Reading Time: 3 min
18

Securing funding that falls short of your project’s actual needs isn’t a lifeline—it’s a slow death. In the hardware world, miscalculating your financial requirements can kill a dream before it even begins.

Do you think “any investment” is always good news?

For a young entrepreneur, being offered 50,000 JOD might seem like a dream come true. But during my journey with DragIoT in 2018, I learned a harsh lesson: funding that fails to cover your actual production and operational costs is a trap. It will consume your time and energy without ever delivering real results.

The DragIoT Experience: When “No” Is the Bravest Decision

In 2018, after winning the Zain Al-Mubadara award and securing initial funding from Shamal Start and Finn Church Aid (FCA) to build our prototype, we reached the stage where we needed more substantial capital to officially launch.

  • The Offer: Organizations like Oasis500 were offering amounts in the ballpark of 50,000 JOD.
  • The Bitter Reality: Our internal feasibility studies revealed a starkly different picture. We discovered that to successfully transition into commercial production, the project required at least four times that amount.

Why Hardware Requires an Entirely Different Funding Approach

Most business incubators evaluate projects through a “software” lens (apps and websites), where the primary overhead consists of salaries and servers. But for DragIoT, the math was completely different:

  • Manufacturing Molds: We needed 14 different industrial molds, and their upfront cost alone was exorbitant.
  • Specialized Teams: Building a cohesive ecosystem—a cloud system, a mobile app, and the physical hardware—requires an army of engineers, not just a single full-stack developer.
  • Operational Overhead: This included office space, physical equipment, servers, and a marketing budget specifically tailored to launch a tangible consumer product.

Accepting a small check meant we would start production only to inevitably stall halfway through when the runway ran out. This realization made it painfully clear that to become the “Arduino of Jordan” we envisioned, we needed serious capital.

Lessons in “Smart Finance” (Advice for Innovators)

If you are currently seeking investment for your startup, keep these core principles in mind:

  • Calculate the “True Cost” Accurately: Don’t just throw out random numbers or rough estimates. In hardware, every single component and every mold has a price tag. Miscalculations are unforgiving.
  • Don’t Be Afraid to Ask for More: If your business model requires 200K, do not settle for 50K just to “get things moving.” Accepting inadequate funding practically guarantees you will fail to deliver on the promises you made to your investors.
  • Investment Is More Than Just Money: Look for an investor who actually understands the nature of hardware, along with its unique legal and logistical bottlenecks—not just a VC willing to write a check.

Conclusion: The End of a Journey, the Beginning of Real Lessons

DragIoT was a massive, ambitious dream. Even though it halted at the prototype and basic app stage due to financial and legal hurdles, the lessons I took away became the foundation for my subsequent ventures.

Sometimes, stopping at the right time and rejecting insufficient funding is the absolute pinnacle of entrepreneurial intelligence. It gives you the necessary space to learn, pivot, and start your next chapter with a much clearer vision.